How far should we go to reduce the number of smokers?
Posted by adminTo halve the number of addicted to cigarettes, a UMP deputy wants to get out the big guns. In his report he says that all packets must be the same, the price increase, the prohibited to smoke multiply … Do you think these measures are excessive or justified?
Price rises, tax revenues, reform of the status of tobacconists, banning smoking on beaches … UMP deputy Yves Bur presented Thursday at the Health Minister Xavier Bertrand is a report that smoking and the tobacco industry in all directions. "We start with an observation rather terrible" and "only a comprehensive approach can address," explains Yves Bur. Its proposals aim to halve the number of smokers, for less than 15% of the population smoked in 2025 against 30% today. "At that time, a motion will be hired and may be considered an output of tobacco," said the member, invested long in the fight against smoking.
The first report recommends the establishment of "an inter-ministerial structure specific to the fight against tobacco," "a single contact", appointed by the Prime Minister, along the lines of what has been done for road safety . The High Council of Public Health has made the same proposal last week. Having seen that "the tobacco industry is the only one not to pay for the damage it generates," Yves Bur proposes to introduce a tax on sales by manufacturers. The tobacco tax revenues are about 11 billion euros a year, he said, while the cost of tobacco-related diseases reached 18 billion, a co-pay 7 billion euros, " the equivalent of social security deficit for 2012 ".
Regarding tobacconists, MP recommends reviewing their status to "not to tie their compensation to the volume of tobacco sales."
Tobacconists angry
The report explores Bur all fields can influence tobacco consumption downward. He recommends "fiscal policy review of tobacco products" and "set targets for increases effective price", a lever often cited by organizations that fight against tobacco. It calls for manufacturers to impose a "neutral standard package", unattractive, and introduce the "sale under the counter", that is to say not to display cigarette packets in newsagents. MP wants to strengthen the means to enforce existing prohibitions, including banning sales to minors, with operations "testing" and penalties "dissuasive" up to and including license revocation. "Banning smoking in front of children has become a rule," said MP: drive to the beach … To help smokers quit, the report recommends a free pick for people in ALD (long-term illness), pregnant women and CMU beneficiaries. Yves Bur also called for "banning links of interest" between the tobacco industry and state officials.
As we approach the presidential election, the member pointed out that the program he proposes "is part of the two five-year period". "It would really be in the spotlight of the presidential candidates to make clear that it will make the fight against tobacco presidential site in terms of health," he said.
"Very angry," the president of the National Confederation of tobacconists, Pascal Montredon, blasted "proposals cloth", seeing the opposite of "work more to earn more". For their part, cigarette makers have described the proposals Bur of "extreme measures", but not really new. They "are an excessive and unrealistic approach," ruled Imperial Tobacco.
And you?
Do you think the measures recommended by Yves Bur are justified? Are they sufficient or excessive?
How far should we go to roll back the number of smokers?